From the library
Dan Sullivan, Benjamin Hardy, 2023
In one paragraph
Sullivan and Hardy argue that a 10x target is easier to hit than a 2x one, because 2x can be reached by working harder at what you already do, while 10x is arithmetically impossible without discarding most of it. The useful mechanism is the forcing function: a target large enough that incrementalism is visibly hopeless changes what you are willing to abandon. Most useful when you are competent, busy and plateaued. Least useful if the constraint is capital, market or circumstance rather than the shape of your commitments, since the book treats nearly every ceiling as self-imposed.
Also tagged
Where this sits in the operating system
Systems Over Goals
Systems Over Goals
Systems Over Goals
Key insights
2x is reachable by working harder at what you already do. 10x is arithmetically impossible without discarding most of it, which is why it is the easier target.
The 80/20 cut is applied to yourself repeatedly: each 10x jump keeps the 20% that worked and abandons the rest, including work you are good at.
The book treats nearly every ceiling as self-imposed. That is its energy and its blind spot.
Recognise it early
The failure and the correction sit side by side deliberately. Read the left column asking whether any of it is already true of you.
Trying to scale current identity and systems
Adding more activities instead of eliminating
Setting realistic goals that don't force transformation
Optimizing bad systems instead of eliminating them
Hiring based on current needs vs. future vision
The same idea, argued differently
Gene Kim, Kevin Behr, George Spafford
Ryan Deiss
Peter Drucker
Brian Christian, Tom Griffiths
The full breakdown
Before you close this
Naming the specific moment you will act roughly doubles the odds you do.
Reference
We use cookies to enhance your experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. You can manage your preferences or learn more in our Privacy Policy.